<a href="http://natomaschurch.wordpress.com" target="_blank">The Gates Are Open</a> is <a href="http://natomaschurch.wordpress.com/2011/10/20/another-argument-on-mars-hill/" target="_blank">reporting</a> that <a href="http://marshill.com/" target="_blank">Mars Hill Church</a> (Mark Driscoll's church in Seattle) is going after another <a href="http://marshillsacramento.com/" target="_blank">Mars Hill</a> asking them to ceast and desist the use of the name Mars Hill.  The post includes the following:
<blockquote><em><strong>Several people from Mars Hill church in Seattle have contacted me and let me know the intention of the Cease and Desist letter is to have Mars Hill Sacramento change their logo. Pastor Hagan has not given me permission to post the letter from the lawyer: However, though I am not a lawyer, the first two paragraphs make it pretty plain they are to change the Name of the church, the Name of the website and the Logo and artwork. The next two pages explain the rationale in legalese. If the original intent was only to have Mars Hill Sacramento change the artwork, that should be communicated clearly by legal counsel. At this point, it clearly says they must change their name also. That is all I can say about this issue without being able to post a copy of the document.</strong></em></blockquote>
The original logos are shown below.

<a href="http://provoketive.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/mars1.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1002" title="mars1" src="http://provoketive.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/mars1.jpg" alt="" width="264" height="105" /></a>

<a href="http://provoketive.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/mars2.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1003" title="mars2" src="http://provoketive.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/mars2.jpg" alt="" width="178" height="105" /></a>

What do you think? Does Mark Driscoll have a case?